Streamlining activation processes, KMSAUTO emerges as a reliable ally for users seeking seamless and efficient activation of Windows and Microsoft Office.

Free ebooks Library Z-Library project z-library zlibrary books download project Immediate Prospect Immediate Unity
The census tract analyzed here is bounded by 38th Street, Boulevard Place, 30th Street, and the canal.

The area where Northwest Indianapolis converges with the wealthy Golden Hill neighborhood has experienced an increase in white residents, millenials, and college-educated residents, as well as the percentage of households earning above the metro area’s median income. At the same time, income inequality is above average here and increasing.

According to data from our latest report, Neighborhood Change 1970-2016, the neighborhood just west of Crown Hill Cemetery (census tract 3905.00) appears to be gentrifying. Located in the northern part of the United Northwest Area, this neighborhood has seen a relative increase in millennials and average family income. In 2010, this neighborhood had relatively few young adults. Three-quarters of the region’s neighborhoods had a higher share of people aged 20-34 than this neighborhood. By 2016, this area had a higher concentration of 20-to-34-year-olds than two-thirds of neighborhoods. The average family income grew from $61,000 to $78,000 (from below the median neighborhood to above).

Income inequality is also increasing in this neighborhood. The GINI Index of Income Inequality has risen from 0.58 to 0.66. The GINI Index is a common measure of Income Inequality. In this index, a score of 0.0 would mean perfect equality—every household earns the same amount. A score of 1.0 means perfect inequality—one household earns all the income, no one else earns any. In Marion County, the GINI Index was 0.48 in 2016.

The share of very poor and very rich residents is increasing.

Share of population by household income, 2010 and 2016.

Income Inequality is higher than Marion County and rising.

Gini Index of Income Inequality in Tract 3905.00 and Marion County, 2010-2016.

Parry Manufacturing Company in 1911. This Indianapolis factory produced carriages and buggies.
Bass Photo Co Collection, Indiana Historical Society. View Source

A History of Two Unequal Neighborhoods

The history of the neighborhood might contribute to its income inequality. This census tract is home to many low-income households, but also to the wealthy Golden Hill neighborhood. It is located where working-class neighborhoods like Northwest Indianapolis and Crown Hill converge with high-income neighborhoods near 38th Street, such as Woodstock and Shooters Hill.

Golden Hill was originally developed as the estate of David Parry, president of Parry Manufacturing Company, a maker of carriages. Platted as several properties in 1872, Parry acquired them all between 1900 and 1907 and hired Scottish landscape architect George MacDougall to design the grounds.

After Parry’s death in 1915, “his family subdivided the estate and hired MacDougall to plan the neighborhood,” according to Sheryl Vanderstel in the Encyclopedia of IndianapolisHistorically, several prominent families lived in Golden Hill, including the Parrys, George H.A. Clowes, William B. Stokely, and William A. Atkins. In 1991, Golden Hill was added to the National Register of Historic Places.

The Frawley Estate in Golden Hill, circa 1922.
 Bretzman Collection, Indiana Historical Society. View Source

Whites account for small share of population, but large share of aggregate income.

Population and aggregate income by race, 2016.

<iframe id="datawrapper-chart-JFmkR" src="//" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="464"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">if("undefined"==typeof window.datawrapper)window.datawrapper={};window.datawrapper["JFmkR"]={},window.datawrapper["JFmkR"].embedDeltas={"100":544,"200":480,"300":464,"400":448,"500":448,"700":432,"800":432,"900":432,"1000":432},window.datawrapper["JFmkR"].iframe=document.getElementById("datawrapper-chart-JFmkR"),window.datawrapper["JFmkR"]["JFmkR"].embedDeltas[Math.min(1e3,Math.max(100*Math.floor(window.datawrapper["JFmkR"].iframe.offsetWidth/100),100))]+"px",window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if("undefined"!=typeof["datawrapper-height"])for(var b in["datawrapper-height"])if("JFmkR"==b)window.datawrapper["JFmkR"]["datawrapper-height"][b]+"px"});</script>

Racial Disparities in Neighborhood Economic Indicators

Census data is not available with enough granularity to explain how the demographics of Golden Hill vary from the rest of the neighborhood. The Census Bureau does estimate that income varies widely by race in this tract. Median income among white households was $71,000 in 2015 (the latest year available for that statistic), while for black households it was $24,714. (For households, the Census Bureau determines race based on the race of the householder.) Even though only 14 percent of the neighborhood is white, white householders account for over half the income earned in the neighborhood.

Since 2010, there has been a decline in black households overall, especially among those earning less than $60,000. (The metro area’s median income is $54,261.) However, there has been a growth of white households earning at least $60,000. This could have lead to increased income disparity between black and white households when compared to 2010.

Number of white households above median income is increasing.

Change in number of households by household income and race of householder between 2010 and 2016.

<iframe id="datawrapper-chart-tGTOQ" src="//" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="200"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">if("undefined"==typeof window.datawrapper)window.datawrapper={};window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"]={},window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"].embedDeltas={"100":264,"200":216,"300":216,"400":200,"500":200,"700":200,"800":200,"900":200,"1000":200},window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"].iframe=document.getElementById("datawrapper-chart-tGTOQ"),window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"]["tGTOQ"].embedDeltas[Math.min(1e3,Math.max(100*Math.floor(window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"].iframe.offsetWidth/100),100))]+"px",window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if("undefined"!=typeof["datawrapper-height"])for(var b in["datawrapper-height"])if("tGTOQ"==b)window.datawrapper["tGTOQ"]["datawrapper-height"][b]+"px"});</script>

The neighborhood currently has a growing population of young adults and college-educated adults. The white population has only grown slightly, from 9 percent white to 14 percent white between 2010 and 2016. That amounts to a net increase of about 100 new white residents. However, that small shift has had an outsize effect on the young adult and college-educated share of the population.

For example, compared to 2010, there are 100 less black residents aged 20-34 and 100 more white residents of that age. The neighborhood has lost a few college-educated black residents since 2010, but gained an estimated 49 college-educated white residents.

Young, college-educated, high-income white residents increasing.

Change in number of households earning $60K or more, residents between 20-34 years old, and residents age 25 and older with a bachelors degree, by race.

<iframe id="datawrapper-chart-NwpIk" src="//" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="299"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">if("undefined"==typeof window.datawrapper)window.datawrapper={};window.datawrapper["NwpIk"]={},window.datawrapper["NwpIk"].embedDeltas={"100":299,"200":299,"300":299,"400":299,"500":299,"700":299,"800":299,"900":299,"1000":299},window.datawrapper["NwpIk"].iframe=document.getElementById("datawrapper-chart-NwpIk"),window.datawrapper["NwpIk"]["NwpIk"].embedDeltas[Math.min(1e3,Math.max(100*Math.floor(window.datawrapper["NwpIk"].iframe.offsetWidth/100),100))]+"px",window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if("undefined"!=typeof["datawrapper-height"])for(var b in["datawrapper-height"])if("NwpIk"==b)window.datawrapper["NwpIk"]["datawrapper-height"][b]+"px"});</script>

A Microcosm of the City

The Polis Center’s Project on Religion and Urban Culture calls the United Northwest Area a “microcosm of the city,” and in some ways that is true even of this small census tract. This census tract happens to have been drawn to include a very wealthy neighborhood and a low-income neighborhood, and this highlights the disparities that exist in Indianapolis overall. Of course, income inequality is sometimes an odd measure at the neighborhood scale. If the boundaries had been drawn differently, by grouping low-income neighborhoods together and high-income neighborhoods together, this would reduce local measures of income inequality. Therefore, income inequality at the neighborhood level is better at describing local conditions than at describing structural issues in our regional economy.

By including wealth and poverty in such close proximity, however, this area does exaggerate and accentuate the disparities in foundational economic indicators like income and education that exist in our city. This area also is a microcosm of the racial disparities that exist in Indianapolis, where for every $1.00 the median black household earns, the median white household earns $1.67 (ACS 2016 5-Year Average via SAVI).

The changes in this neighborhood may further increase those disparities, as all the net gain in higher-income households, college-educated population, and millenials has been among white residents and households.

See How Your Neighborhood Has Changed

Find more interactive content from our series on neighborhood change.

No Results Found

The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.

Read more about